Every year, the Kellogg-Morgan Stanley Sustainable Investing Challenge invites teams of graduate students from around the world to develop and pitch creative financial approaches to tackle pressing social and environmental challenges. The Challenge facilitates connections with leading industry professionals in order to identify, empower, and inspire those who will make up the future of sustainable finance.
The Challenge: Design a Creative Financial Solution for an Urgent Social or Environmental Problem
Awards
Everyone gets an educational experience, but teams who advance get a lot more too. All competitors are eligible to participate in a virtual sustainable finance career trek that will feature company presentations, career-focused panels, and networking opportunities.
Grand Prize: $10,000
Runner Up: $5,000
Third Place: $2,500
Eligibility
Teams are limited to a maximum of four (4) members.
All team members must be currently enrolled in a graduate program at the time of the prospectus submission.Undergraduate students are not eligible.
Your team may include members from different graduate schools.
All ideas must be the original ideas of the team members.
Judging Criteria
Creativity & Financial Innovation (25%)
Has the team proposed an innovative investment vehicle that is designed to drive both returns and impact? They are looking for either:
An innovative financial structure or
A known investment approach applied creatively to a problem previously outside the scope or reach of a social or environmental challenge
What’s interesting about this project? Is it just like a dozen others or truly innovative?
Does the proposal have a unique capital structure, e.g., including different forms of capital, employing diverse types of institutional investors?
Does the proposal uncover new ways to drive returns, a new asset class, or a new cash flow or value stream?
Impact & Scale (25%)
Does this provide a scalable solution that can mobilize sufficient capital and forge significant environmental or human impact?
Are there specific metrics for impact? Is the impact real and persistent?
Does the impact derived from the proposed approach stem from the financial levers rather than ancillary charitable remains?
Has the team demonstrated diligence in defining and projecting the impact to be derived?
Feasibility (25%)
Does the investment thesis seem plausible?
Are there real sources of risk-adjusted market rate returns here? (even if considering a gestation period with concessionary returns)
Could you see institutional investors responding to and funding this?
Was the thesis thoroughly researched and is there strong evidence of financial depth that incorporates the overall economy?
Quality of Due Diligence & Financials (20%)
How thorough and deep is the research on the thesis?
Do the returns and cash flow projections hold water? Has the team demonstrated strong financial logic and the validity of key financial assumptions?
Have the key investment questions relating to returns, asset quality, underwriting, and risk management (both market-based and non-market) been identified and addressed?
Does the team have the skills needed to execute? Have they defined the skills needed on the investment team?
Are the proposed fees and incentives reasonable?
Presentation (5%)
Has the team been clear, compelling, and concise with their proposal?
For the final event: Have all team members participated in either the original presentation or Q&A?
